-30%
upvote odds for hedged replies
Tentative, hedged language is the default LLM output style. Goyal et al. (CHI 2026, arXiv:2509.10370) found it reduces upvote odds by 30% in a causal study of 11 million posts. Forcalabs replaces hedge stacks with direct, specific statements.
15
moderators interviewed
Lloyd, Reagle, and Naaman interviewed moderators of 15 large subreddits. They named exact openers, vocabulary patterns, and formatting choices as instant credibility kills. These are now blocked at generation in Forcalabs.
+43%
upvote lift for broad framing
Broad discussion-generating framing beats narrow help requests by 43% in upvote odds. Forcalabs applies this framing signal automatically based on post type, so every reply is written for distribution, not just for accuracy.
Cornell CSCW 2025 (Lloyd, Reagle, and Naaman, arXiv 2311.12702) interviewed moderators of 15 large subreddits. Here is what they actually look for, built into our filter.
"delve", "tapestry", "camaraderie"
Reinhart et al., PNAS 2025: ChatGPT uses "camaraderie" 150x more than humans
"It's not just X, it's Y" · "Navigate the complexities" · "At the heart of"
Wikipedia "Signs of AI writing" #1 pattern + kdgbalmer/ai-tells catalogue
"Great question!" · "Certainly!" · "Here's a breakdown"
Cornell CSCW 2025: named as instant credibility kills by 12 of 15 mods
Bullet points in r/relationships · Bold subheadings in any comment · Numbered lists for prose
Cornell moderator interviews: lethal in narrative subreddits
"Studies have shown..." · "On one hand... on the other hand..." · omnidirectional hedging
CHI 2026 causal study: tentative language has negative effect on upvote odds
Liimatta (2019) and Frenken (2025) analyzed 37 subreddits using Biber multi-dimensional register analysis. Three distinct registers emerged. Most AI defaults to Informational regardless of context, which is exactly why AI replies get downvoted in r/relationships and r/funny. We pick the register first.
r/relationships, r/AITA, r/TIFU, r/confession
First-person anchored. Contractions always. Emotional grounding first. Zero bullet points.
r/AskHistorians, r/AskScience, r/explainlikeimfive
Citation or credential up front. No speculation. Refusal to over-claim.
r/personalfinance, r/legaladvice, r/cscareerquestions
Second-person "you". Specific numbers. Insider acronyms. Numbered steps only for discrete actions.
+43%
Higher upvote odds
Broad discussion-generating framing versus narrow help requests
+40%
Readability lift
Per standard deviation of Flesch reading ease. Clear prose wins.
-30%
Question-heavy penalty
High interrogative ratio tanks odds. One strong question max.